Friday, June 19, 2009

Financial Industry Regulatory Reform is on the Way—And We Will be Ready.

This week President Barack Obama unveiled his proposal for the most significant regulatory reform of the banking, investment, and financial industries since the Great Depression. Coming on the heals of a financial meltdown and the near collapse of the banking system even staunch supporters of decades of deregulation and relaxed enforcement have acknowledged that something must be done.

The President’s proposal was neither as sweeping as some critics had called for, nor as restrained as some industry leaders had hoped.

As summarized in the Wall Street Journal the plan includes the following key elements:

Regulation of Financial Firms:

Creates Financial Services Oversight Council, to coordinate activities among regulators, replacing the President's Working Group.

Brings financial firms big enough to pose a risk to the financial system the under Federal Reserve (Fed) regulatory umbrella, including regular stress tests.

Gives the Fed oversight over parent companies and all subsidiaries, including unregulated units and those based overseas.

Brings industrial banks, non-bank financial firms and credit-card banks into a more traditional bank holding company structure subject to federal oversight.

Kills the reputedly weak Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and redistributes its regulatory duties over “Thrift” institutions, credit unions, and certain insurance company functions.

Kills the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) program that supervised investment banks.

Registers hedge funds, private-equity funds and venture-capital funds with the SEC, allowing the agency to collect data from the firms.

Levies new requirements on hedge funds in areas such as record keeping, disclosure and reporting.

Regulation of Financial Markets:

Regulates markets for over-the-counter derivatives and asset-backed securities, strengthens regulation of derivatives dealers, and forces trades to be executed through public counterparties, such as exchanges.

Cedes more power to the Fed over the infrastructure that governs these markets, such as payment and settlement systems.

Calls for more conservative capital requirements and tougher rules on counterparty credit exposure.

Tightens laws to protect unsophisticated parties from trading derivatives inappropriately."

Harmonizes the powers and authority of the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to avoid conflicting rules relating to the same products.

Consumer and Investment protection:

Establishes the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), a new agency with broad authority over consumer-oriented financial products, such as mortgages and credit cards which will coordinate with state regulators.

Defines standards for simple plain vanilla products, such as mortgages, which would have to be offered "prominently" by companies offering such products.

Empowers the CFPA to write rules and levy fines based on a wide range of existing statutes.

Calls for new authority for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over the banking sector in areas such as data security.

Beefs up the FTC’s power to regulate unfair, deceptive or abusive practices.

Mandates duties of care that will have to be followed by financial intermediaries, such as stock brokers and financial advisers.

Crisis Management:

Provides authoritive means for the government to take over and unwind large, failing financial institutions.

Outlines a process for deciding when to invoke this power, which could be initiated by the Treasury Department, Fed, FDIC or SEC.

Reserves final authority to make decision to the Treasury, with the backing of other regulators.

Authorizes the Treasury to decide how to fix such failing firms through a conservatorship, receivership or some other method.

Makes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) the conservator or receiver, except for broker dealers or securities firms, which the SEC would take over.

Requires prior written approval by the Secretary of the Treasury to exercise the Fed's emergency lending powers.

Meanwhile, Congress has been considering its own plans. Senate Banking Committee Chair Christopher Dodd, for instance, instead of beefing up the Fed’s authority has proposed stripping the central bank of all of its regulatory authority and combining those powers with the regulatory duties of the FDIC in a wholly new consolidated bank regulator.

Powerful business interests, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce announced opposition to key element’s of the administration plan almost immediately.

Some influential financial gurus, most notably Nobel Prize winning New York Times columnist Paul Krugman argue that the President has made a good start, but has still not come to grips with the underlying causes of the recent crisis.

But whatever the final result will be, change—big change—is coming to the financial industry and how it does business. You can rely on a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) like Oaktree Capital, to not only keep current with those changes, but to assure you that come what may our clients will get the highest standard of service.

Please feel free to contact me at oaktreecapitalgroup@comcast.net if you have any questions or concerns.

Friday, June 12, 2009

GuideStar Survey Shows Hard Times for Charitable Organizations



GuideStar, which gathers and publicizes information about nonprofit organizations, reported in it May that these are indeed Hard Times for Charitable Organizations.

A survey of GuideStar Newsletter readers representing 2,979 organizations including 501(c)(3) public charities and private foundations conducted on-line between March 2 and March 16, 2009 found that 52 percent of organizations reported a decrease in giving. That figure was significantly higher than the 35 percent who reported lower contributions for January-September 2008, which was nearly double the 19 percent who reported a decline for January-September 2007.

Clearly the economic hard times are squeezing donors. At the same time non-profits are also being hit by losses to endowments and other invested funds as well as cut-backs of government support from all levels and often slowing payments of money due from state and local agencies.

All the while many organizations, particularly those in the social service and health care areas are also facing an explosion of new clients. 59 % of organizations reported increased demand for their services.

31% of grant makers reported having to make decreases in awards.

No wonder that 8% of respondents said that they were in “imminent danger of folding because of financial reasons.”

Non-profits are understandably tightening their belts in these circumstances. While only 35% had yet cut their budgets from the last fiscal year, that figure would have been much higher if demand for services had not also risen rapidly. More are expected to make cuts—deep cuts—in the next budget cycle.

Of those who have already slashed expenditures, GuideStar reports that “57 percent had reduced services, 45 percent had frozen staff salaries, 37 percent had imposed hiring freezes, and 30 percent had resorted to layoffs. Other strategies included salary reduction (20 percent), reduction in employee benefits (20 percent), and reduction in operating hours (13 percent).”

Small and medium size non-profits with slender staff resources are particularly hard hit at times like this.

Oaktree offers both investment and asset management services and management, consulting, and staff support services to these hard pressed organizations.

If you are involved in a non-profit—or care about one—contact us for information on how we can help. Call 773 725-8787 or e-mail oaktreecapitalgroup@comcast.net .